Collectivism Is The Solution To The Problem Of Voluntaryism
If we can’t imagine people who are doing so well that they want to be of help to others, then we think in terms of collectivism.
The globalist cleptocratic parasites know that the bulk of humanity is willing to be led – even in an authoritarian context. They create a thin veil of plausibility to convince these sheep and combine that with compartmentalization.
Among their weaknesses is that as soon as the bulk begin to realize they service a hegemony that is feeding on them, the whole structure is endangered.
The fear that led the ‘elite’ to think they are ‘special’ is the very ‘structure’ they themselves are held hostage by.
How Big Is Google?
(click picture to show the video)
Google is doing it without our knowledgeable consent, but with our naive participation.
The Scarcity Myth
Scarcity can be real, but only for a time. Mankind always has and always will develop a means to deal with scarcity… unless it is Artificial.
The scarcity is then used as a means to socially engineer.
Artificial scarcity has been used this way throughout history – even back in the time of the Romans!
Please examine the photo and see if the social engieering has succeeded in our society.
Breaking: New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Government
(click picture to show the article)
Green and dodgy ‘science’!
Wow NASA, Cisco, And A Tricked-Out Planetary Skin Could Make The World A Safer Place
Wikipedia Hierarchy
(click picture to show the video)
Wikipedia tries to be more than it really is. I have my own history of dealing with them. If you put up truthful information that disagrees with their take, you get ‘shoveled’. Some of the bibliographies are good, but most of it is pablum.
Thanks #RT for getting the message out there.
The Polar Vortex Explained in 2 Minutes
(click picture to show the video)
The NPR-style NLP voice will not convince anyone, but trendies that what you say is true. Global warming… ah… climate change… (changed at Bilderberg 2010) is the means to usher in a new global taxing scheme. Personal and Collective sovereignty is being transfered to this global system in order to keep us ‘safe’.
Why are we not looking at REAL global problems like Fukushima?
Intel Announces Edison, A Computer the Size Of An SD Card
(click picture to show the article)
Why aren’t we discovering and creating ourselves rather than pay corporations to create things that are going to replace us? Something is really wrong here.
We are creating a nightmare when we could have a wonderful dream made reality.
The name Edison is fitting (if you know how Edison treated Tesla.)
Ignorance Loves To Criticize the Word ‘Anarchy’
Another example of the social engineering is the prison culture implantation being made into society via the ‘bitch’-paradigm.
It is morphing the dominant social meme towards polarization between masochism and sadism where ‘membership to the trendy mainstream’ forces you to choose one role or the other.
The ideas of Edward Bernays, Rand Corporation, the many ‘Philanthropists’, Foundations and think tanks are gutting our cultures as well as our personal and collective sovereignty.
Meet Atlas – DRC-Robot
(click picture to show the video)
They’re being built to help you. They just wana help mankind..
Now give them your money to build them,… ‘kay?
(You know it’s trendy…)
Everything you type is recorded. Even if you don’t post it.
(click picture to show the article)
The long-term future of AI(and what we can do about it): Daniel Dewey
(click picture to show video)
This is more about harvesting funding for computer hardware and software than about anything we can take seriously.
@01:20“[AI] It’s a bit like a particle. There are arguments as to why it should exist, but we haven’t been able to confirm it yet.”
And you won’t either. Particles are not fundamental, rather they are only a manifestation of an underlying (and completely fundamental) field.
The current AI is lost in, just like physics, a compulsion to explain the world in only physical terms. Meaning of World, Thought and Language will continue to elude them as long as they keep on chasing a failed and bereft paradigm. It sure is trendy, but it’s false.
Matt Damon on Civil Disobedience
(click picture to show the video)
Wicked Problems
(click on picture to show the video)
Sustainability is Agenda 21 plain and simple. Sustainability’s original meaning has been altered by Peter Singer and other premature globalists to signify the goal to look at everything including people as a resource that must be inventoried and managed and taxed.
One of the means it uses to achieve its ends is to create or to acerbate and then to replicate the idea or artificial scarcity and to maintain that our resource pool is limited and potentially endangered. All of these are simply excuses to motivate the naive well-meaning masses into cooperation in the creation of a dominance hierarchy.
If the product is called ‘smart’, then you know it’s Agenda 21. Look up “Behind the Green Mask” and ICLEI for the details on this attack upon our individual and collective sovereignty.
The very same people who were charged with leading our civilization to advancement have failed and mismanaged the very resources and environments that they use as their justification for this movement to global management and taxation.
The Global Warming… ah… Climate Change hoax is another means to achieving their goal. In reality it is simply banksters creating a thin veil of plausibility to justify the taking of our wealth and our sovereignty. They create another industry out of these designs and pay us with fake money to enslave ourselves.
Look here for truth on the matter:
http://www.behindthegreenmask.com/
Oprah: Racists Have to Die for Racism to End
(click on picture to show the video)
The man doing the interview is a total mess, isn’t he. Woah!
Anti Gun Propaganda
(click picture to show the article)
This is another example of the social engineering being worked upon us. Think Progress wants us to believe that people with guns are intimidating women protesting against them.
However in reality they are posing for a picture. The forces behind gun control are naked in their attempt to create a world where only government and the criminals have guns.
Power robs the brain of empathy
(click the picture to show the article)
“Power robs the brain of empathy.” Oh? Then soon tyrants will be victims of illness needing medication. What a bunch of ‘bravo sierra’! Make’s you wonder who’s paying these researchers anyway?
The causal relation has been turned around. It’s like putting the cart before the horse!
Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Document – Full Read
(click on picture to show the video)
Our leaders were supposed to lead us. Instead they see us as parasites that they must free themselves of. In every attribute of being human there are haves and have-nots. It is the responsibility of the strong to aide the weak in every aspect there is of being human. All begin at some level and attain new levels of being. When man exercises hegemonic behavior upon itself, it endangers itself.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf
Steven Pinker: The surprising decline in violence
(click on picture to show the video)
We now move closer to a global war. Steven Pinker’s conceptions seem to be unaware of the USA/NATO backed false-flag terror in Syria. Yet he claims we are living in an age of less violence? The violence in Syria is happening to all of mankind.
The Fiction of Relationship with Arnold Weinstein
(click on picture to show the video)
Lawrence M. Krauss – “A Universe From Nothing
(click on picture to show the article)
Everything is Miscellaneous
(click on picture to show the video)
@01:35– 10,000 years? Hmmm… hasn’t mankind been at organizing physical objects, ideas and knowledge longer than that?
@04:10– We can have more than one field in one spot at the same time. We can also superimpose objects, ideas and knowledge…
@04:35– Some things must NOT go someplace physically although they are physical: hunger, thirst, …
@13:13– Slicing among attributes is not useful unless an underlying context associates them. That is one of the reasons why you see miscellany.
@13:39-“Every attribute is a joint…”: only if you cannot associate these attributes with a surrounding context to place them in. Otherwise we have only data… miscellany.
@25:39-“There is no single way of organizing the world”: yet the ‘world’ does it quite nicely. We only run into trouble when we cannot or will not see the underlying structure in the organization. This structure cannot be separated from its form and function and still make sense.
@34:47– Post-modernism has been very successful in the deconstruction of the accumulated wisdom and culture of our ancestors. It replaces that wisdom with an artificial and contingent [one] which finally leads to nihilism. Our society is learning, fortunately, to grow beyond this movement and the hidden dangers it presents to our freedom, liberty, and sovereignty (personal and as a group) that we see eroding around us.
@34:59– You say post-modernists are correct in saying that the intent of an author isn’t as important as the reader’s decision about what their work is about! If we take this view seriously, then we subordinate the judgment of the creator of the work to that of a particular readership which, in effect, turns the whole relationship between them on its head! The readership can ‘measure’ the work according to any criterion it chooses, but the intention of the author is decisive for true meaning.
@35:17– You question the validity of believing the world is organized in one way. The general view is, however, that the world is organized according to its relationships to other parts of itself – whether recognizable to the observer or not. The choice of how that organization is interpreted depends entirely upon the one doing the observation. Nevertheless the inherent relationships do exist and are viable regardless of how we choose to look at them.
@43:55– You say the “world’s greatest expert” has become irrelevant. You pay tribute to the fact that [correct] knowledge is arrived at through refinement processes. The creator of an idea is never irrelevant; not even functionally! No matter how that idea is refined, the progenitor of the idea is just as important as any other ‘participant’ in that refinement process!
@44:11-“bugs get driven out of ideas through discussion…
@44:13-“through the public negotiation of conversation… That’s where knowledge is.” Knowledge however does not confine itself to being negotiated or even being correct and/or useful! Knowledge also encompasses much more than validity claims can confine. It is necessary to remember that knowledge and meaning are partners in the relationship they have with each other which may or may not involve truth value.
@44:23– A mailing list is used as a form of knowledge
@44:31-“I find out what the news is…” (information)
@44:33-“I see people who know way more than I do…” (authority)
@44:37-“…arguing amongst themselves…” (negotiation)(?)
@44:39-“…These are experts in conversation…” (authority)
@44:43-“…It’s very clear that the mailing list knows more than any of the experts on it do…” (non sequitur)
@44:45-“…and this is a really, really good thing…” (judgment)
@44:47-“…really good thing – this public negotiation of knowledge through conversation…” (judgment)
The elements in your talk at this point seem to indicate that knowledge depends upon authority, judgment, negotiation and ‘group-think’. Is knowledge not more than these perspectives and interpretations? The use of language “the mailing list knows more…” suffers greatly. It is clear that you mean the members of the group know more as a whole than any single member (which is a truism).
The idea that knowledge is negotiable disturbs me. Do you not mean that the meaning of knowledge is negotiable? Your talk seems more to be describing information than it describes knowledge.
@44:51– The John F. Kennedy assassination page of Wikipedia is offered as a specimen of knowledge and is used a precursor to what you @44:53 claim is a missing element of knowledge: Infallibility! This is an attempt to redefine knowledge, yet knowledge cannot be thusly defined as it can contain error too!
@44:33-“We know that Wikipedia is on our side.” Informed researchers are aware that Wikipedia contains, among its many strengths, many deficits. Not the least of those deficits is the bias found in much of its biographical information.
@45:41– The relationship of credibility to authority is also confusing. There are many cases where authority is wrong and incredible. Why do you not allow ALL knowledge to be ‘saved/captured’ as you allow with information? Should we not treat both equally?
@49:47-“Oh God! I hate myself.” That utterance, while most certainly meant as humor on your part, is inappropriate for anyone to say – even in jest. I thought you should know.
Critical of Steven Pinker – Too Much Morality – On London Real
(click on picture for video)
Too much morality?
@36:05 you state how terror groups can be started with a half-dozen sitting in a barber shop or pub in the attempt to sell us on the idea that terrorism can arise out of our own midst. Most of the terror groups that ever did so were larger groups and most of them (probably almost all) were infiltrated by our own governmental agencies who then radicalised and financed their terrorism. This was made clear to be the case with the Klu Klux Klan in the 1950s and 60s.
@36:10 “And there can be nasty surprises…”
You don’t take into account the fact that almost all narcissistic despots have been put in by ‘global players’ (and banksters and higher up the ‘food chain’). And for “spreading revolution” why not turn your attention how the US, NATO and Saudi Arabia have joined forces in coordinating Al Qaeda (AL-C-I-A-duh) in Syria?
@36:23 “So there are nasty shocks. There are [sic.] a baseline level of violence that, except for a totalitarian state, you’re never going to stamp out to zero…”
A totalitarian state is where the violence a society endures reaches its climax. At that ‘place’ humanity begins to ‘shed its skin’ and replace the tyranny with liberty and freedom.
Hegelian dialectic is one of a few dialectical forms that takes on the illusion of being correct. Hegel didn’t honestly consider that there are other kinds of dialectic forms that can occur.
This is not necessarily a measure of progress. Far more important is the quality of that life span. The elitist mindset has a great deal of inherent hubris as it carries out the ‘stewardship’ of humanity. If it were REALLY concerned with the development of better life spans, then it would stop the overwhelming fraud in finance markets and use those ‘resources’ to feed and educate those of need. Look at our cities. Life is being sucked out.
Heurist.me (Carey G. Butler) 