What do all things have in common?

Posts tagged “fraud

Complexity At the Cost of Being Simple

Computational ComplexityComplexity At the Cost of Being Simple
There are grievous problems with complexity ‘science’. Some of those problems are apparent here. I will note a few of them.

Reductionism at @13:00 is completely annoying. Epiphenomenological aspects of the problem are completely missing when you reduce into pure binary! It’s like taking you and your emotional life (with its incipient impact on your immune system) and reducing it down to DNA!

“There are way more problems than there are solutions.” @17:00!Sure! When you peel away the contextual embedding of any problem (via reductionism), then you’ve just committed a sort of lobotomy!

The definition of NP at @23:00 while correct, reveals how misguided this theory is. Not all choices are guesses, and correct answers aren’t always ‘lucky’.

Check out the response one receives from the system (algorithm) at @25:11.Did you notice something’s wrong or what?

@26:51 Does anyone notice who is supplying the criterion for the value of ‘correct’? The algorithm is being falsely attributed with properties it can only be endowed with and not arrive at on its own!

@30:00 The rules to Tetris are known by both (algorithm and human) however, the proof of a truth value cannot be computationally arrived at in NP, yet the proof – via a human being AND the skills necessary to ‘prove’ anything can do it in P! It should be obvious that we are going about the whole thing in the wrong way by now!

@31:00 the P<>NP Problem is described. The problem is meaningless and yet you’ll get a Millenium Prize for solving it! (Even sane and not sane find themselves in the balance! Whoa!) If you continue listening to the justification, you might want to be near a bathroom.

@32:27 Check out how NP is being determined to be ‘more’ than P! “Nobody in their right mind…”, “Obviously insane…”,… so naturally NP must be more than P!
Sounds reasonable? I don’t think so…

@32:37 Watch the disappointment: “…very annoying…” and I wonder why? The question is meaningless! Other phrasings of the P<>NP Problem are nothing special and are completely obvious: “You can’t engineer luck.” (Excuse me, but isn’t that the definition of luck in the first place?) and “Solving problems is harder than checking them.”

@34:17 “What could we possibly say… this is all kind of weired…” I don’t know anymore either and I sure hope you don’t tell me! Are we at the end of the lecture already?

@35:53 Now we are getting to the ‘meat of the potato’. If we just “believe in… have faith in…” P<>NP, then Tetris is within NP-P! Wait a minute? That doesn’t sound like any proof to me… perhaps it’s an axiom? We’ll see. It sure looks like begging the question, but I want to be convinced so I’ll just have to wait.

@36:43 He then moves on to a ‘proof’ that looks more like a set of definitions! NP-hard and NP-complete are correctly defined, but they do not prove anything! Tetris and chess act like a definitions, as well!

@40:33 Now he wants to talk about reductions. Wait, weren’t we talking about them already? Let’s take a look…

Yes, we stand upon giants [Authoritarianism]@46:15(Karp’s 3-Partition) and don’t need to think about it anymore and just reconfirm that all NP-complete is reducible to each other! You find some problem that was defined by a “giant” to be a member of your classification and then show that yours is at least as hard @48:47.

If we happen to find a better solution to a member of NP-complete, then either the whole house of cards falls down or we simply reclassify (by reduction) it to P! Now believe it or believe what you want, okay?

There will be a time when we have to revisit mathematics and do a house cleaning of this ‘cuddle muddle’.


I’ve Got a Bridge To Sell You!

Sustainability In The Modern World TrailerI’ve Got a Bridge To Sell You!
Sustainability = Resource-based zero sum mentality. It sounds so convincing. They are transferring the responsibility for the pillage of our world from the bankster-led corporatism running our governments to the whole of humanity.

This ‘smart’ (sustainable) industry is paid for by those who will profit from it most.
They’ve already got the air you breathe, now they’re coming after your water… and soon, your right to exist.

We are the living Earth, but if we are not wise enough to match their cleverness, we shall be renting everything we need to survive and hold dear.


Trendy Isn’t It? Redefining What’s Yours, Mine and Ours!

Rachel Botsman - The Case for Collaborative Consumption
Manipulative Transformation of the Definition of Sharing and Ownership to Resource and its Management
Redefining what’s yours, mine and ours. These people despise groups who may challenge them.

Of course, all in the name of saving the Earth! And so touchy feely trendy to boot! Soon we won’t be able to drive a car on our own!
They are trying to move the center of gravity for sovereignty from the individual to the collective. Anything organic (like sharing) must be controlled and mandated.

They try to dignify the damage Amazon is doing to entrepreneurship by reclassifying the industry. The placement of Agenda 21 (Mean Green Meme) and ICLEI to be trendy mainstream.


Learning To Read Their Hand By Using Discernment To See The Pattern – The Pixar Theory

The Pixar Theory

If you’re proud of your ability to read between the lines, then see if you are up to this test!
It’s sad they relate everything to each other in terms of conflict. This is premature globalism. Everything is set at odds with another.

The culture of fear and control…
Scarcity and Creation by means of destruction.

Their most important relationship to their world is measured (for them) in terms of control. Their fear dictates their necessity for that control (leading to a pathology). A portion of humanity branches itself off into what is known as a dominance hierarchy whose aim is for ‘full-spectrum dominance’.

For us their actions make no sense and are obviously wrong, but they actually believe they are doing the right thing! That’s one of their reasons for needing to feel they’re ‘special’ (we cannot understand them like they think they do themselves).

They try to satiate their insatiable appetite for security by inserting control mechanisms everywhere they find an opening for them. It becomes so natural for them that they no longer even recognize their own proactive and reflexive actions!

Thusly, they actually create the very reasons for their fear. Our not accepting their methods also gets fed into their psychotic dance thereby creating more fear within them requiring more drastic measures to quell their higher sense of fear. This heightened sense of fear creates even more need to mitigate itself leading to a vicious cycle in which the snake eats its own tail…


Eric Holder Lining Up For A Pardon?

Holder behind barsHouse Wants Federal Judge to hold Eric Holder in Contempt, Fine Him & Possibly Jail Him

Read more here.

Sooner or later, justice is coming to this man. He may be able to get a pardon from Obama, but that will only cover the charges they gather here (it looks like they’re planning this now). What he won’t get away with, is his possible involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing that they won’t dredge up here


You Can Vote, But It Doesn’t Count – Scotland Vote Rigging Exposed

You Can Vote, But It Doesn’t Count!
Proof of voter rigging in the vote for Scottish Independence.
It’s a short video with a few examples.Scottish Vote Rigging Exposed


Link

Human race will ‘split into two different species’

Human race will ‘split into two different species’

This would be a perversion of humanity.

The global elite want to sell us and their minions this future anathema. They do not realize that this idea is wrong on many levels. There are outliers in every distribution, whether it be a particular attribute or humanity itself. Who should decide and what should be decided to cleave our distribution?!?

When does the process end?  The minions who would carry this out are themselves in danger in the next rung of ‘cleaving’.

If we do this to ourselves, other civilizations in the universe would know we could do it to them – we would never be trusted.

Why must humanity mark itself with eugenic distortion in the first place? Our ability to embrace and include members of our ‘body’ is the higher and more honorable form of being not only for flesh and blood, but for our individual and collective psyche as well.

It is about natural laws that we must not break, lest we destroy ourselves or our future.