What do all things have in common?

Social Engineering

Which questions does Category Theory help us answer?

Category 02

Another chapter in my attempt to help break the ‘spell’ of the category theoretical ‘ontologicisation’ of our world.

This may seem to many as a purely academic question, but we all need to realise that all of what we consider a modern way of thinking rests upon ‘mental technologies’ such as Category Theory.

Academics are literally taking the ‘heart’ out of how our world is being defined!
If we don’t pay attention, humanity will continue losing its way.

Category theory is a wonderful and powerful tool; nevertheless category theory, with all of its utility, is purely ontological. It can masterfully answer questions such as ‘Who?’, ‘What?’, and ‘How?’.

Category 01

However; it is regretfully inadequate to form a comprehensive representation of knowledge, for it lacks expression of epistemological value, which are the very reasons for is use. Epistemology is about answering the questions of ‘Why?’, ‘What does it mean?’, ‘What is my purpose?’,…
Answers to questions of this kind are implicitly supplied by us during our consumption of the utility afforded by category theory. We often are so beguiled by this power of categorical expression that we don’t realise that is we ourselves who bring the ‘missing elements’ to what it offers as an expression of knowledge.
It does a wonderful job with exteriority (ontology), but cannot sufficiently describe nor comprehensively access interiority (epistemology). Therefore, it has limited metaphysical value with respect to philosophy in general.

Interiority 08

Philosophies of mind, of language, or of learning are not comprehensive using only category theoretical tools.
Categorical structures are highly portable, but they can describe/express only part of what is there. There are structures, dynamics, and resonance that the ontology and functionalism in category theory completely turns a blind eye to.
More general than category theory is knowledge representation. It includes and surpasses category theory in many areas, both in scope and depth, but in particular: knowledge representation includes not just the ontological aspects of what we know, it goes further to describe the epistemological as well.
The qualities of Truth, Goodness, Beauty, Clarity,… can be defined and identified within a knowledge representation if the representation is not restricted to ontology. When category theory is used for the purpose of defining qualia, the objects must first be ontologised and functionally reduced. Trying to grasp them with tools restricted to category theory (or even semiotics) is like grasping into thin air.

 

Category theory, although very powerful, is no match for the challenge of a complete representation of knowledge. Category theory will tell you how to tie your shoes, but it can’t tell you why you are motivated to do so.


Race Baiting Is Trendy – Political Correctness Until ALL Are Silent

Melissa Harris-Perry - Be super careful

Link to video.

It’s as if history started and stopped in the American Civil War. Yet all through history including Greeks, Persians, Egyptians, Romans,… all had slaves of ALL races. This was always a HUMAN problem, not a BLACK one!

We are encountering a new kind of racism now: Reverse racism.

The new racism is being fed by social engineers like Melissa Harris-Perry. I’ve posted on this woman before and many times on this subject.
Melissa Harris-Perry also thinks your children are property of the State:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29FhZ5Dseec

They are being funded by the likes of George Soros and their goal is to sow enmity between the races.

http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/billionaire-george-soros-funded-ferguson-riots-34230/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/20/soros-backed-group-launches-bid-to-keep-syrian-refugees-flowing/

Many poor and unfortunate people OF ALL RACES (as you know) are buying into the scam. If the social engineers are successful, they will have us all going at each other in the streets so that the real people causing the fighting (the #banksters ) can come in and play referee.

They then will roll out new laws and a police state more than already has been seen. There’s history of the torture and maiming of humanity all throughout even the dark ages, yet we are so connected to this race baiting that we see nothing else.

The banksters want us to dwell on the cruel treatment of slaves, but the real issues go much deeper. It’s about being manipulated by people who PROFIT from slavery AND racism that is our main concern. We must examine causes and not just symptoms.

Cruelty has been worked upon ALL people of the world. Slavery as well. Look at the CAUSES of it, instead of what cruelty was done. These are the REAL issues that humanity must deal with: why it happened and why racism is being baited now?

What do I have to do with people who were here BEFORE I was born?!?

We all have families that were slaves!

There is never a mention of black slave traders:
http://www.amren.com/news/2013/03/did-black-people-own-slaves/

No mention of black slave owners:

http://www.teachingushistory.org/lessons/BlackSlaveOwnersinCharleston.html

Nor the existence of white slaves is mentioned; some of which were owned by blacks!

http://www.ironbarkresources.com/slaves/whiteslaves09.htmSlavery is a human problem not a racial one.

The Irish were bought sold by all races: https://peoplestrusttoronto.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/irish-the-forgotten-white-slaves/Here Mulatto Slave traders:

http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/10/mulatto_slave_traders_who_were_they.htmlThe Africans even fought among each other in the traffic of their own peoples:
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/41431#sthash.nzakX2KK.dpuf

and

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/article_8941.shtmlEven Jews were involved (and quite prominently, I might add:

http://rense.com/general69/invo.htm

It’s so sad how young and fertile minds are so easy to turn towards destruction. I won’t play the chump. I SEE how we are being manipulated.

I personally have Irish, Scottish, American Indian, Black, and Mexican people in my family. What are we now to do – ‘disown’ and hate each other just because the ‘Collective’s’ social engineers want us to go at each other?

I decided I will not be played for a chump. Notice also here the term for people as ‘folks’ (a radical’s term for people being chumped).

See Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals:
http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals


Really! Nothing Is ‘Real’

Is anything RealAnother example of the ‘neo-snake-oil salesmen’ peddling you trendy pabulum and neo-Babylon confusion. My current project Mathesis Universalis http://mathesis-universalis.com will bring an end to this menagerie of nonsense and subtle programming.

I could write a book on this.
Don’t believe everything put forward in this… set of perspectives. This is a work in process so stay tuned… updates are coming very shortly.

I’m happy that he allows for more than 5 senses as this is a common error made by science and philosophy up to this time. I’ve taken issue with it elsewhere numerous times. Also I’m pleased that he is allowing for Neuroplasticity (Dr. Jeffrey M. Schwartz http://www.jeffreymschwartz.com/ has been leading this new model for over 10 years.)

Up to @04:27 I take issue with two important assumptions he makes:
1) That sensory information is the only way we ‘register’ reality.
2) He is a physicalist pure through. If he can’t measure and quantify it, then it doesn’t exist for him… This leads to what is known as causal ambiguity (among other things).
http://psychologydictionary.org/causal-ambiguity/

@04:57– He says that memory is stored all over the brain. This is incorrect. The effects of the phenomena of memory are manifested in various areas of the brain. There is no sufficient and necessary proof that memory is stored there! They PRESUME it to be stored there, because they can not allow or imagine anything non-physical being able to store any kind of knowledge.

@05:09“How many memories can you fit inside your head? What is the storage capacity of the human brain?” he asks.

In addition to the presumption that memories are stored there, he then ignores the capacity of other areas of the body to imprint the effects of memory: the digestive tract, the endocrine and immune ‘systems’,… even to cell membranes (in cases of addiction, for example)!!!

@05:23“But given the amount of neurons in the human brain involved with memory…” (the first presumption that memories are stored there) “and the number of connections a single neuron can make…” (he’s turning this whole perspective on memory into a numerical problem!) which is reductionism.

@05:27– He then refers to the work of Paul Reber, professor of psychology at Northwestern University who explained his ‘research’ into answering that question. here’s the link. I will break that further stream of presumptions down next.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-memory-capacity/
(the question is asked about middle of the 1st page of the article which contains 2 pages)

Paul Reber makes a joke and then says:
“The human brain consists of about one billion neurons. Each neuron forms about 1,000 connections to other neurons, amounting to more than a trillion connections. If each neuron could only help store a single memory, running out of space would be a problem. You might have only a few gigabytes of storage space, similar to the space in an iPod or a USB flash drive.”

“Yet neurons combine so that each one helps with many memories at a time, exponentially increasing the brain’s memory storage capacity to something closer to around 2.5 petabytes (or a million gigabytes). For comparison, if your brain worked like a digital video recorder in a television, 2.5 petabytes would be enough to hold three million hours of TV shows. You would have to leave the TV running continuously for more than 300 years to use up all that storage.”

These presumptions and observations are full of ambiguity and guesswork. Given that we are not reading a thesis on the subject, we can allow him a little slack, but even the conclusions he has arrived at are nothing substantial. More below as he reveals his lack of knowledge next.

“The brain’s exact storage capacity for memories is difficult to calculate. First, we do not know how to measure the size of a memory. Second, certain memories involve more details and thus take up more space; other memories are forgotten and thus free up space. Additionally, some information is just not worth remembering in the first place.

He not only doesn’t know to measure memories (which he admits), he cannot even tell you what they are precisely! He offers here also no reason for us to believe that memory is reducible to information!

@05:50“The world is real… right?” (I almost don’t want to know what’s coming next!)

And then it really gets wild…

@05:59– With his: “How do you know?” question he begins to question the existence of rocket scientists. He moves to Sun centric ideas (we’ve heard this one before) to show how wrong humanity has been in the past.

He seems to ignore or not be aware of the fact that that many pre-science explorers as far back as ancient Alexandria knew better and had documented this idea as being false. This ‘error’ of humanity reveals more about dogma of a church/religion/tradition than of humanity/reality as it truly is.

@06:29“Do we… or will we ever know true reality?” is for him the next question to ask and then offers us to accept the possibility that we may only know what is approximately true.

@06:37 “Discovering more and more useful theories every day,  but never actually reaching true objective actual reality.”

This question is based upon so much imprecision, ignorance, and arrogance that it isn’t even useful!

First of all: we cannot know “true objective actual reality” in all of its ‘essence’, because we must form a perspective around that which we observe in order to ‘see’ anything meaningful. As soon as a perspective comes into ‘being’, we lose objectivity. (ignorance, assumption)

He doesn’t define what ‘reality’ for him is. (imprecision)

He doesn’t explain what the difference between ‘true’ and ‘actual’ might be. (imprecision, assumption)

Theories are NOT discovered, rather created (implicit arrogance). They can only be discovered if they were already known/formulated at some time.

Also; theories do not stand on their own; rather, they depend upon continued affirmation by being questioned for as long as they exist. We DO NOT store knowledge in our answers; rather, in our questions.

[continued…]


Quantum Weirdness To Meaninglessness

Quantum Weirdness To Meaninglessness

Quantum Weirdness To Meaninglessness

Physicists: your days are numbered. Don’t say we didn’t warn you.
Owen Maroney worries that physicists have spent the better part of a century engaging in fraud.

It’s a mess!
Ever since they invented quantum theory in the early 1900s, explains Maroney, who is himself a physicist at the University of Oxford, UK, they have been talking about how strange it is — how it allows particles and atoms to move in many directions at once, for example, or to spin clockwise and anticlockwise simultaneously. But talk is not proof, says Maroney. “If we tell the public that quantum theory is weird, we better go out and test that’s actually true,” he says. “Otherwise we’re not doing science, we’re just explaining some funny squiggles on a blackboard.”

Link to document: http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.17585!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/521278a.pdf

Sadly, the writer doesn’t grasp the depth and breath of the whole affair: It’s not only physics!
The time is coming when every single card in their ‘house of cards’ is going to come down.

They’ve been lying to us everywhere:
1) Uncertainty
2) Chaos
3) Randomness
4) Philosophy
5) Complexity
6) Meaning
7) Scarcity
8) Mathematics

The list goes on and on. I’m one of those who are going to bring the whole charade down… and I’m not alone.


The Parasites ‘Need’ a Pow Wow

The richest want a PowWowThe Parasites ‘Need’ a Pow Wow The ‘need’ (control/fear fetish) for full-spectrum dominance. We must live out their nightmare so that they can save us. Will they be proud of their ‘work’ in a galactic context when our neighbors see what we’re up to?

We suffer from an awful shortage of humans in the universe, but they tell us there’s too many of us! It’s all an expression of their fear and need to control others. Even where there are no problems, they will create them so that they may mark them, touch them and make them ‘safe’.

Our problem isn’t a lack of resources, it’s the hoarding of them!


Social Engineering and Propaganda Placement via Humor Moves On

Jon Stewart leaving 'The Daily Show'

Social Engineering and Propaganda Placement via Humor Moves On

 Jon Stewart (Leibowitz), the comedian who made Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart,” a nightly home for sharp-edged political satire and up-to-the-moment commentary on the news, said on Tuesday that he planned to leave the program.

Mr. Stewart made the announcement on Tuesday’s episode. His departure was confirmed by the channel, which said in a statement, “Jon will remain at the helm of ‘The Daily Show’ until later this year.”http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/11/arts/television/jon-stewart-leaving-daily-show.html


Hiding in Plain Sight – The Empress is Naked

Julia Roberts is Mother Nature

Hiding in Plain Sight – The Empress is Naked
Destructive Memes For the Undiscerning Mind

Let’s blame all of humanity for the sins of a parasitic ‘elite’ who knows nothing better than to destroy in order to create. If things were as they should be, we would be living in the clouds and traveling to the stars right now.

This is how unrestrained bankster-led corporatism hides in plain sight. If they can paint us a picture in which WE are the problem, then the failure of those we trusted to guide and steward our world don’t stand out anymore.

Will they be be proud of their eugenics and their attempt to divide humanity against itself? What account will they tend of their stewardship of Earth? Will our galactic neighbors trust a species who is a danger to itself? Those who do this to humanity in order to rule the world destroy themselves as well.


What We Can’t Do At Home We Do In Coventry

IslamInCoventry

We Can’t Do This At Home, So We Do It In Coventry
A further example of artificial diversity.


Desperately F(r)ee

AH-Google-Logo-White-1.2Desperately F(r)ee
The desperate attempt to introduce a fee structure (injecting cost per use by ‘hook or crook’ into a free market) and make it trendy too!

Google Launches ‘Contribute’ A No-Ad Way To Surf The Internet to help us more enjoy our experience on the Internet. Full-spectrum dominance just like you’d boil a frog… ever so slowly.


A Message From Our Sponsors: Shell – It’s a Small Worm After All

It's a Small Worm After All(The Rothschild Family) 1 1/2 Minutes of Psyence Pysense.

Can science change the world? Film-makers from around the globe explore what it takes to have an idea that could change the world.
Marielle Woods aims to prove it can, with a tongue-in-cheek look at how a simple worm farm potentially connects to bio-fuels. One idea can spur another idea, creating a chain of events that could one day help ‘make the future’ (before it gets here!).

[Update: notice his wanton disregard for the consequences of his actions and views…]


Complexity At the Cost of Being Simple

Computational ComplexityComplexity At the Cost of Being Simple
There are grievous problems with complexity ‘science’. Some of those problems are apparent here. I will note a few of them.

Reductionism at @13:00 is completely annoying. Epiphenomenological aspects of the problem are completely missing when you reduce into pure binary! It’s like taking you and your emotional life (with its incipient impact on your immune system) and reducing it down to DNA!

“There are way more problems than there are solutions.” @17:00!Sure! When you peel away the contextual embedding of any problem (via reductionism), then you’ve just committed a sort of lobotomy!

The definition of NP at @23:00 while correct, reveals how misguided this theory is. Not all choices are guesses, and correct answers aren’t always ‘lucky’.

Check out the response one receives from the system (algorithm) at @25:11.Did you notice something’s wrong or what?

@26:51 Does anyone notice who is supplying the criterion for the value of ‘correct’? The algorithm is being falsely attributed with properties it can only be endowed with and not arrive at on its own!

@30:00 The rules to Tetris are known by both (algorithm and human) however, the proof of a truth value cannot be computationally arrived at in NP, yet the proof – via a human being AND the skills necessary to ‘prove’ anything can do it in P! It should be obvious that we are going about the whole thing in the wrong way by now!

@31:00 the P<>NP Problem is described. The problem is meaningless and yet you’ll get a Millenium Prize for solving it! (Even sane and not sane find themselves in the balance! Whoa!) If you continue listening to the justification, you might want to be near a bathroom.

@32:27 Check out how NP is being determined to be ‘more’ than P! “Nobody in their right mind…”, “Obviously insane…”,… so naturally NP must be more than P!
Sounds reasonable? I don’t think so…

@32:37 Watch the disappointment: “…very annoying…” and I wonder why? The question is meaningless! Other phrasings of the P<>NP Problem are nothing special and are completely obvious: “You can’t engineer luck.” (Excuse me, but isn’t that the definition of luck in the first place?) and “Solving problems is harder than checking them.”

@34:17 “What could we possibly say… this is all kind of weired…” I don’t know anymore either and I sure hope you don’t tell me! Are we at the end of the lecture already?

@35:53 Now we are getting to the ‘meat of the potato’. If we just “believe in… have faith in…” P<>NP, then Tetris is within NP-P! Wait a minute? That doesn’t sound like any proof to me… perhaps it’s an axiom? We’ll see. It sure looks like begging the question, but I want to be convinced so I’ll just have to wait.

@36:43 He then moves on to a ‘proof’ that looks more like a set of definitions! NP-hard and NP-complete are correctly defined, but they do not prove anything! Tetris and chess act like a definitions, as well!

@40:33 Now he wants to talk about reductions. Wait, weren’t we talking about them already? Let’s take a look…

Yes, we stand upon giants [Authoritarianism]@46:15(Karp’s 3-Partition) and don’t need to think about it anymore and just reconfirm that all NP-complete is reducible to each other! You find some problem that was defined by a “giant” to be a member of your classification and then show that yours is at least as hard @48:47.

If we happen to find a better solution to a member of NP-complete, then either the whole house of cards falls down or we simply reclassify (by reduction) it to P! Now believe it or believe what you want, okay?

There will be a time when we have to revisit mathematics and do a house cleaning of this ‘cuddle muddle’.


I’ve Got a Bridge To Sell You!

Sustainability In The Modern World TrailerI’ve Got a Bridge To Sell You!
Sustainability = Resource-based zero sum mentality. It sounds so convincing. They are transferring the responsibility for the pillage of our world from the bankster-led corporatism running our governments to the whole of humanity.

This ‘smart’ (sustainable) industry is paid for by those who will profit from it most.
They’ve already got the air you breathe, now they’re coming after your water… and soon, your right to exist.

We are the living Earth, but if we are not wise enough to match their cleverness, we shall be renting everything we need to survive and hold dear.


Trendy Isn’t It? Redefining What’s Yours, Mine and Ours!

Rachel Botsman - The Case for Collaborative Consumption
Manipulative Transformation of the Definition of Sharing and Ownership to Resource and its Management
Redefining what’s yours, mine and ours. These people despise groups who may challenge them.

Of course, all in the name of saving the Earth! And so touchy feely trendy to boot! Soon we won’t be able to drive a car on our own!
They are trying to move the center of gravity for sovereignty from the individual to the collective. Anything organic (like sharing) must be controlled and mandated.

They try to dignify the damage Amazon is doing to entrepreneurship by reclassifying the industry. The placement of Agenda 21 (Mean Green Meme) and ICLEI to be trendy mainstream.


Learning To Read Their Hand By Using Discernment To See The Pattern – The Pixar Theory

The Pixar Theory

If you’re proud of your ability to read between the lines, then see if you are up to this test!
It’s sad they relate everything to each other in terms of conflict. This is premature globalism. Everything is set at odds with another.

The culture of fear and control…
Scarcity and Creation by means of destruction.

Their most important relationship to their world is measured (for them) in terms of control. Their fear dictates their necessity for that control (leading to a pathology). A portion of humanity branches itself off into what is known as a dominance hierarchy whose aim is for ‘full-spectrum dominance’.

For us their actions make no sense and are obviously wrong, but they actually believe they are doing the right thing! That’s one of their reasons for needing to feel they’re ‘special’ (we cannot understand them like they think they do themselves).

They try to satiate their insatiable appetite for security by inserting control mechanisms everywhere they find an opening for them. It becomes so natural for them that they no longer even recognize their own proactive and reflexive actions!

Thusly, they actually create the very reasons for their fear. Our not accepting their methods also gets fed into their psychotic dance thereby creating more fear within them requiring more drastic measures to quell their higher sense of fear. This heightened sense of fear creates even more need to mitigate itself leading to a vicious cycle in which the snake eats its own tail…


I Really Want To Agree… But I Just Can’t! – Max Tegmark – Cahners Theater

I Really Want To Agree… But I Just Can’t!
I did it again (for a friend) and tolerated another hour of this man’s presentation (see my post following this one where I cover the one I watched on August 31st).
I do NOT report this in a spirit of cruelty or meanness, rather to help others recognize when concepts and causality are being confused. I’m just as shocked as anyone else that this is possible.

Beyond the Higg’s Boson, which is not a convincing ‘discovery’, is his claim that the universe is mathematical at (31:00). “In the sense that it [universe] is a mathematical structure.”

Mathematics is simply a precise language!

Here’s one avenue, but I can give others, that may help understand why mathematics cannot be the universe, rather a means to represent it.

Patterns and shapes can be described mathematically just as they are now being described with my words. When he widens his definition to include them (shapes and patterns, structure,…) they represent literally everything and become part of his definition!

He also assigns humanity as a whole as the designer for technology that our amok running corporations have made (and have led the rest of us who ‘enjoy’ employment with them to build for them). The Cuban Missile Crisis isn’t a problem created by humanity as a whole, rather was created by corporations who work for banksters to further their ends.

Causality is all wrong throughout his presentation. Believe me, I wanted to be enthralled by his wisdom, but I’m left disappointed for many reasons… many for which I’ve made no mention.


Spreading It Thick! Hopelessness Propaganda Placement That Doesn’t Even Smell Good! (BS)

Humans Need Not Apply
Helplessness Propaganda Placement Video

This propaganda piece is easy to decode. Let’s play like we’re redundant.

We will never make humans redundant. Even if those who run and control our society want it that way! Creativity cannot be replaced and, although this video mentions it, it’s only ‘intelligence’ masking it.

I’m thinking of the film WALL-E. The humans were redundant and left the Earth on some pointless trip and left intelligent robots on the Earth to clean up their garbage.

The analogy of the horse fails (among other analogies in the film) when one realizes that horses were only assigned the purposes that we imagined for them. (Not to mention for ourselves!)

The film is social engineering propaganda designed to drive hopelessness into the viewer. It’s more of this arrogant in your face ‘Get used to it, like it or not’ weaponized culture (‘bitch culture’) they sell to us.

Just because our corporations are leading us to a place where automation takes our jobs away they have not and cannot take our usefulness in creativity away. They are describing more about their failure than their victory. They describe a culture and social fabric that they created, not WE!

The whole of humanity, and all of its potential (which they have failed to find access to) is not even being considered in this artificial world they are creating!

There are many other subtle mind manipulations going on in this piece, but I’d like to leave that open for future discussion.