“Freedom of Speech is a Privilege Intended for Educated Professionals”
“Freedom of Speech is a Privilege Intended for Educated Professionals”
“It should be illegal… if he cannot verify his statements…”
This is what happens when ‘Authority’ has been perverted to cancel an inherent right of humanity!
Are these ramifications being considered in Google Search?
Google is making what I feel are really big mistakes right now basing its technology upon the work of people who promulgate fear-control based paradigms and archetypes. Google is creating a beast that will devour even itself! See this, for an example: https://plus.google.com/104704674433954659866/posts/Mw9BR6WZNSQ
Behind the desire to stop gaming of Search from the outside, they do not provide us with a guarantee that Search will not be gamed from the inside!
What if you are deemed unpopular or dangerous to the ruling power monopoly?
Will they still let you have a voice or will they call you ‘non-authoritive’ or claim you’re not part of the search results because of a programming error!
It’s also about trust:
I’ve programmed SaaS applications (basically, cloud applications) and learned the basics of that technology from a well-known university which I won’t name here.
I was often in dispute with the professor and his proverbial ‘disciples’ (until they began to ignore me 😉 ) about the failing code of ethics and guarantee of privacy in the SaaS paradigm. Now, more than a year later, they ‘magically’ have made small progress in that vein.
I still wouldn’t trust them with my data and you shouldn’t either!
The terms and framing they have chosen will not save them from the coming ‘disruptive’ (using their term – I would use the term ‘reharmonizing’ instead) technologies that are coming down the pike which are going to change things drastically for everyone in a constructive(!) way! Google’s framing now, in comparison with these technologies as they arrive, will become a ‘straightjacket’ for itself.
There are those who are aware of this coming time (it’s all approaching a critical threshold very soon) and are preparing for it now, by creating free and open source technology with regard to Search and based upon a completely different paradigm of trust, openness and distributed control by putting that control in the hands of the user themselves.
http://mathesis-universalis.com
http://yacy.net/en/
(for just two of them)
This technology will be coming of age in the next 2 years – provided our controllers don’t take what’s left of the playing field away – which they have done before.
When Does The ‘Coming Out’ Of Destruction Want To Seem To Be Normal?
The source article is a deception (Source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists)
The globalist parasites that feed on us and have built this culture/environment we are ‘living’ in want us to believe the destruction they are bringing down upon humanity is a normal cycle.
If we believe them, then we deserve our fate!
Yet a natural process is taking place!
Outliers who occupy an upper ‘elite’ section of a distribution have always led the rest of the population it belongs to. What is decisively important is what attributes that small group shares and projects onto the rest.
This natural process can act as a sort of illness/enslavement or a healing/empowerment upon the rest of the population. This ‘constant form’ finds expression in practically every living system and upon multiple levels.
The need for illness and enslavement of the remaining population is a sign where this ‘elite class’ is based upon fear and control which is malevolent in nature. This leads to a severance of membership to the rest of the population and its own destruction and, quite possibly, the remaining population.
The need for healing and empowerment of the remaining population is a sign where this ‘elite class’ is based upon love and trust which is benevolent in nature. This leads to a binding of membership to the rest of the population and its own survival and, quite possibly, the remaining population.
We are being ruled by a malevolent elite class which has gone rogue and, like a cancer, wrapped its metastases in, through and around the rest of us. They do this by eliciting the aid of those who are asleep or unaware among us or by those who are awake/aware, but are unwilling or unable to resist them.
The ‘natural’ cycles mentioned in the article need not be! It is up to us to decide here and now what side of history we want to be on.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is quoted to have said: “We are not human beings having a spiritual experience, we are spiritual beings having a human experience.”
If that statement is true, then we are here for many reasons:
To discover who we are.
To create who we are.
To decide who we are.
To witness others.
…
To be of aid or be of service to others.
Who will you be, witness,… serve?
The Myth of Paving the Way for New By Means of Destruction
The Prometheus fans (both the Movie and the Myth) have bought into the falsehood that “in order to create we sometimes must destroy” meme. (This meme makes its appearance in the new Avengers film!)
This false-paradigm was created by people who will profit from it most – those who want or need the destruction of personal and collective sovereignty, because it stands in their way.
We must learn to recognize their ‘handywork’. Behind that meme lurks an even more malevolent lie: The Ends Justify Their Means.
The ends DO NOT justify their means, rather the ends are defined by their means!
Modernism and Post-Modernism have been busily redefining all ‘organic’ ideas into artificial replacements. John Dewey was particularly active in this regard, but the ‘tradition’ was carried on after him to the present by the neo-liberals and progressives.
http://voices.yahoo.com/how-john-dewey-progressives-redefined-the-356855.html?cat=37
Google’s Ray Kurzweil On Artificial Intelligence, Human Immortality
(click picture to show the article)
The ongoing perception deception masking malevolence with benevolence.
True intelligence can never be artificial and the mind is much more than the brain can be used to explain it.
He is wrong in many ways. Even if he has really foreseen other inventions, this is one where he is wrong. They will, however, made a good show of it, by convincing us of their success so that we buy into the fraud with investment or participation.
Breaking: New Climate Data Rigging Scandal Rocks US Government
(click picture to show the article)
Green and dodgy ‘science’!
Wow NASA, Cisco, And A Tricked-Out Planetary Skin Could Make The World A Safer Place
Coronal Hole
In reality this ‘hole’ is the singularity field that comprises the Sun’s mass staring out through the plasma dynamics that surround it.
We are told that a black hole arises through the death of a star! In reality the black hole was always there!
The science of today is not what it should be and has taken ‘hostage’ of real scientific inquiry. The education of our children amounts to indoctrination crafted to block real science that disagrees with their interests.
The Polar Vortex Explained in 2 Minutes
(click picture to show the video)
The NPR-style NLP voice will not convince anyone, but trendies that what you say is true. Global warming… ah… climate change… (changed at Bilderberg 2010) is the means to usher in a new global taxing scheme. Personal and Collective sovereignty is being transfered to this global system in order to keep us ‘safe’.
Why are we not looking at REAL global problems like Fukushima?
Sally Kohn: Let’s Try Emotional Correctness
(click picture to show the video)
Emotional correctness: a new way to be trendy
It used to be called tolerance and empathy.
Social engineering that shifts the responsibility of an individual to a group.
Very crafty stuff. The people in the audience lap it up like its a Popsicle.
Intel Announces Edison, A Computer the Size Of An SD Card
(click picture to show the article)
Why aren’t we discovering and creating ourselves rather than pay corporations to create things that are going to replace us? Something is really wrong here.
We are creating a nightmare when we could have a wonderful dream made reality.
The name Edison is fitting (if you know how Edison treated Tesla.)
Kara : A PS3 New Technology
(click picture to show the video)
For those barren of humanity, the next place is barren humanity.
Has anyone taken the time to ask themselves why we are being driven to create machines like we are instead of use our creative power in developing ourselves?
Cognitive Computing
(click picture to show the video)
“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking inside a radio for the announcer” – Nassim Haramein
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the mind cannot be reduced to a brain.
Everything you type is recorded. Even if you don’t post it.
(click picture to show the article)
Grady Booch: The Human and Ethical Aspects of Big Data
(click picture to show the video)
Important questions we should be answering now… not later. Important examples throughout modern history and where it influences and is influenced by it.
Banned TED Talk: Nick Hanauer “Rich people don’t create jobs”
(click picture to show video)
Our present economic system is similar to how we once thought the Earth was center of our solar system.It’s no wonder it was pulled from TED. This is not the message they want out there.
The long-term future of AI(and what we can do about it): Daniel Dewey
(click picture to show video)
This is more about harvesting funding for computer hardware and software than about anything we can take seriously.
@01:20“[AI] It’s a bit like a particle. There are arguments as to why it should exist, but we haven’t been able to confirm it yet.”
And you won’t either. Particles are not fundamental, rather they are only a manifestation of an underlying (and completely fundamental) field.
The current AI is lost in, just like physics, a compulsion to explain the world in only physical terms. Meaning of World, Thought and Language will continue to elude them as long as they keep on chasing a failed and bereft paradigm. It sure is trendy, but it’s false.
Wicked Problems
(click on picture to show the video)
Sustainability is Agenda 21 plain and simple. Sustainability’s original meaning has been altered by Peter Singer and other premature globalists to signify the goal to look at everything including people as a resource that must be inventoried and managed and taxed.
One of the means it uses to achieve its ends is to create or to acerbate and then to replicate the idea or artificial scarcity and to maintain that our resource pool is limited and potentially endangered. All of these are simply excuses to motivate the naive well-meaning masses into cooperation in the creation of a dominance hierarchy.
If the product is called ‘smart’, then you know it’s Agenda 21. Look up “Behind the Green Mask” and ICLEI for the details on this attack upon our individual and collective sovereignty.
The very same people who were charged with leading our civilization to advancement have failed and mismanaged the very resources and environments that they use as their justification for this movement to global management and taxation.
The Global Warming… ah… Climate Change hoax is another means to achieving their goal. In reality it is simply banksters creating a thin veil of plausibility to justify the taking of our wealth and our sovereignty. They create another industry out of these designs and pay us with fake money to enslave ourselves.
Look here for truth on the matter:
http://www.behindthegreenmask.com/
Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Document – Full Read
(click on picture to show the video)
Our leaders were supposed to lead us. Instead they see us as parasites that they must free themselves of. In every attribute of being human there are haves and have-nots. It is the responsibility of the strong to aide the weak in every aspect there is of being human. All begin at some level and attain new levels of being. When man exercises hegemonic behavior upon itself, it endangers itself.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT.pdf
Steven Pinker: The surprising decline in violence
(click on picture to show the video)
We now move closer to a global war. Steven Pinker’s conceptions seem to be unaware of the USA/NATO backed false-flag terror in Syria. Yet he claims we are living in an age of less violence? The violence in Syria is happening to all of mankind.
The Fiction of Relationship with Arnold Weinstein
(click on picture to show the video)
Lawrence M. Krauss – “A Universe From Nothing
(click on picture to show the article)
Everything is Miscellaneous
(click on picture to show the video)
@01:35– 10,000 years? Hmmm… hasn’t mankind been at organizing physical objects, ideas and knowledge longer than that?
@04:10– We can have more than one field in one spot at the same time. We can also superimpose objects, ideas and knowledge…
@04:35– Some things must NOT go someplace physically although they are physical: hunger, thirst, …
@13:13– Slicing among attributes is not useful unless an underlying context associates them. That is one of the reasons why you see miscellany.
@13:39-“Every attribute is a joint…”: only if you cannot associate these attributes with a surrounding context to place them in. Otherwise we have only data… miscellany.
@25:39-“There is no single way of organizing the world”: yet the ‘world’ does it quite nicely. We only run into trouble when we cannot or will not see the underlying structure in the organization. This structure cannot be separated from its form and function and still make sense.
@34:47– Post-modernism has been very successful in the deconstruction of the accumulated wisdom and culture of our ancestors. It replaces that wisdom with an artificial and contingent [one] which finally leads to nihilism. Our society is learning, fortunately, to grow beyond this movement and the hidden dangers it presents to our freedom, liberty, and sovereignty (personal and as a group) that we see eroding around us.
@34:59– You say post-modernists are correct in saying that the intent of an author isn’t as important as the reader’s decision about what their work is about! If we take this view seriously, then we subordinate the judgment of the creator of the work to that of a particular readership which, in effect, turns the whole relationship between them on its head! The readership can ‘measure’ the work according to any criterion it chooses, but the intention of the author is decisive for true meaning.
@35:17– You question the validity of believing the world is organized in one way. The general view is, however, that the world is organized according to its relationships to other parts of itself – whether recognizable to the observer or not. The choice of how that organization is interpreted depends entirely upon the one doing the observation. Nevertheless the inherent relationships do exist and are viable regardless of how we choose to look at them.
@43:55– You say the “world’s greatest expert” has become irrelevant. You pay tribute to the fact that [correct] knowledge is arrived at through refinement processes. The creator of an idea is never irrelevant; not even functionally! No matter how that idea is refined, the progenitor of the idea is just as important as any other ‘participant’ in that refinement process!
@44:11-“bugs get driven out of ideas through discussion…
@44:13-“through the public negotiation of conversation… That’s where knowledge is.” Knowledge however does not confine itself to being negotiated or even being correct and/or useful! Knowledge also encompasses much more than validity claims can confine. It is necessary to remember that knowledge and meaning are partners in the relationship they have with each other which may or may not involve truth value.
@44:23– A mailing list is used as a form of knowledge
@44:31-“I find out what the news is…” (information)
@44:33-“I see people who know way more than I do…” (authority)
@44:37-“…arguing amongst themselves…” (negotiation)(?)
@44:39-“…These are experts in conversation…” (authority)
@44:43-“…It’s very clear that the mailing list knows more than any of the experts on it do…” (non sequitur)
@44:45-“…and this is a really, really good thing…” (judgment)
@44:47-“…really good thing – this public negotiation of knowledge through conversation…” (judgment)
The elements in your talk at this point seem to indicate that knowledge depends upon authority, judgment, negotiation and ‘group-think’. Is knowledge not more than these perspectives and interpretations? The use of language “the mailing list knows more…” suffers greatly. It is clear that you mean the members of the group know more as a whole than any single member (which is a truism).
The idea that knowledge is negotiable disturbs me. Do you not mean that the meaning of knowledge is negotiable? Your talk seems more to be describing information than it describes knowledge.
@44:51– The John F. Kennedy assassination page of Wikipedia is offered as a specimen of knowledge and is used a precursor to what you @44:53 claim is a missing element of knowledge: Infallibility! This is an attempt to redefine knowledge, yet knowledge cannot be thusly defined as it can contain error too!
@44:33-“We know that Wikipedia is on our side.” Informed researchers are aware that Wikipedia contains, among its many strengths, many deficits. Not the least of those deficits is the bias found in much of its biographical information.
@45:41– The relationship of credibility to authority is also confusing. There are many cases where authority is wrong and incredible. Why do you not allow ALL knowledge to be ‘saved/captured’ as you allow with information? Should we not treat both equally?
@49:47-“Oh God! I hate myself.” That utterance, while most certainly meant as humor on your part, is inappropriate for anyone to say – even in jest. I thought you should know.
Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Science
(click on picture to show the article)
The Age of ‘Data Ubiquity’ : Sensor Spread (IoT – Internet of Things)
(click on picture to show the article)
Heurist.me (Carey G. Butler) 