Knowledge Representation – Self and Other
Knowledge Representation of Self and Other
This knowledge representation, which I made for a presentation in Nürnberg on April 29th, 2013, depicts a partial resonance domain with respect to sentient relation and orientation. The representation is not designed to be comprehensive in any respect, rather it is intended to help those who are not accustomed to viewing knowledge in this way.
It shows how, to quote Carl Sagan: “One voice in the Cosmic fugue.” can be represented more generally. There are certainly other possibilities with respect to relation and orientation between self and other.
You may need to stop this video occasionally as some of the transitions occur very quickly.I’ve indicated what is happening in the representation to aid in the interpretation of what is being shown.
I would appreciate any feedback you may want to give. I’d be pleased to answer any questions that may arise.
Thank you for watching!
UPDATE:
A question has come in from an anonymous source asking for clarification on the use of “Resonance Domain”.
A resonance domain is comprised of resonance fields. When one or more fields are being examined, the group is called a domain.
For further clarity I’d like to add that we are looking at two separate fields (sentient beings) in terms of the relation they participate in and the orientation they share with each other.
Fields are always composed of other sub-fields and contain even partial fields from other sources!
UPDATE: “Why do you use the word ‘sentient’ in your description?”
There are basically three types of entities in our universe:
1) Having some measure of interiority (concept of self).
2) Artifacts
3) Heaps
‘Self and other’ can come in any number of combinations:
The knowledge representation above requires that at least two of the participants are of type 1 (sentience) for this knowledge representation to hold.
Examples:
Type 1) human and type 1) dog will work.
Type 1) human and type 2) book will not work.
Type 1) human and type 3) rock will not work.
This way of looking at our Kosmos (multiverse) is called Mathesis Universalis.
For those interested in more on the subject, go to http://mathesis-universalis.com.
[PS: There are also the conditions that both participants are conscious of each other and that their shared consciousness is such that differences in semantics between them are ‘reconcilable’ (coherence). (for the scientists/mathematicians among us!)] 😉
“Mathematistan” by Martin Kuppe
(click picture to show the video)
A fascinating description and overview of much of the mathematics based upon logic.
Be careful though! This map is only a representation and not the territory itself. In fact, some mathematics we are aware of cannot be found on this map! Also, and even more importantly, there are mathematics, where mathematics and metaphysics merge (Knowledge Representation), that cannot be visualized in this fashion at all.
You Are Not Your Brain – Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz
(click picture to show the video)
Forget positive and negative thoughts and move towards understanding the more general differentiation of constructive and destructive thoughts.
Neuroplasticity and how it can, for just one example, cure OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder) without drugs!
I’ve been reading this man’s work since 2005 and I’m just as enthusiastic now about it as I was back then!
Fractals – They Are Like Reading Novels
They Are Like Reading Novels – One Must Simply Know How To ‘Look’
Meaning is everywhere… even in these seemingly ‘random’ complex domains.
There is no coincidence without meaning!
Please do stay tuned!
Real Knowledge Is Not Bound To Our Conceptions
AI (Artificial Intelligence) may be easier, but OI (Organic Intelligence) is more comprehensive.
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/07/04/reality-experience-morphic-fields-power-choice-2/
Muster all of your courage to break loose from conventional wisdom on knowledge and you will be open to new potential that just may, if you are diligent, bring you to the ‘promised land’.
Don’t take the word of an outsider (outlier) like me. Simply open your mind to other possibilities.
“And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear their music.” – Friedrich Nietzsche
Organic Intelligence(OI):
‘Music’ our technology is trying to replace instead of understand.
Meaningful Thoughts From a Little Big Man!
(click picture to show the video)
Adaption = Celebration
Watch to really understand (see) the connection.
Fractals – Varied Dimension Over a Complex Domain
(click picture to show the article)
Former laser physicist turned artist, Tom Beddard, has created these incredible fractal models. They are ‘truly fractal’, because you can see more and more detail, the closer you peer down onto the surface.
Nature Of Perception
(click picture to show the video)
The principles of organization in qualitative authenticity… from a ‘Cosmic Snoop’!
“We’ve been given a physics of non-life…”
“To be alive you constantly change yourself…”
“Life is the inventor…”
“Humans are different than animals, because they are story telling creatures.”
It’s Called a Knowledge Graph, but It Makes Nice Pictures
When did association amount to real knowledge?
Am I the only one to recognize something’s wrong with this picture?
Big Bang is Big Bunk!
(click picture to show the article)
Someday people will junk the ‘theory’ (if you can call it that!) on the junk pile like phrenology!
(pssst… there’s a VERY short conclusion in case you don’t have time to read the whole article.)
An Organically Universal Frame of Mind Arises
As if it were a ‘combination lock’, if we begin to ask the right questions… the ‘tumblers’ move…
http://humansarefree.com/2011/05/lets-illuminate-and-dream-awake.html
UPDATE: http://www.istockphoto.com/video/world-network-20381126 (an attractive representation of data)
Can an Artificially Intelligent Machine Have Human-like Emotions?
A Little Less Artificial Sleepiness and a Little more Organic Wakefulness
The ‘Royal Road’ to emotion starts with understanding ‘who’s making the journey’ to our feelings!
Human emotion will never be understood through as long as you are isolating them to the brain. The brain is NOT the seat of mind nor of consciousness. The brain, cells, nervous system, colon, … behave like an antennas capable of resonating at varying frequencies which correspond to the mind. The mind however; is a complex set of fields surrounding the body itself.
Human emotion will never be understood sufficiently to reproduce it in an organic way as long as our paradigm for mind, cognition, understanding and wisdom remain isolated to the brain. The brain is NOT the seat of mind nor of consciousness, rather the physical part of those processes.
And it’s not alone!
The ‘travellers’ are our brain, cells, nervous system, colon, … even our biochemistry. They behave like a set of antennae capable of resonating at varying frequencies which correspond to those of the mind and consciousness.
The mind is composed of a complex set of fields surrounding the body itself – all of which are interacting with each other constantly and in different ways.
Our current research in cognition – although still in its ‘training shoes’ – is quite effective (especially when it has been weaponised) in deceiving those who should know better… our science and technology.
The rest of us must ‘profit’ from their delusion.
A journey worth making right now!
Let there be light – Mike Oldfield
(click picture to show the video)
It only takes the length of the song – about 6 minutes.
Who’s Really Pulling the Strings?
(click picture to show the article)
It’s odd to watch how we allow others to pull our strings to keep us at odds with each other… each side very sure of their stance.
This may be about religious freedom to you, but this is about much more than that.
The recipe is very simple:
If I want to advance an idea for social engineering then I must simply ‘fashion’ that idea in terms of a religion. I get more ‘bang for my buck’! Here’s why:
1) Those falling for the religious spin will divide themselves (polarize themselves) around that and fight over it.
2) Those who think they’re above all that religious mumbo jumbo will turn it into an issue of rights and fight over that.
3) Those who think they’re on the winning team are pleased, because they think the whole escapade brings everyone working on it closer to ‘home’. They don’t realize that they themselves are ‘on the menu’ later, because the proverbial snake eating it’s own tail will never be able to stop. If they have played ‘favorites’ before in that last cycle, what will stop them from playing favorites again in the new one? In that case, who will be ‘next’?
Is this how we represent mankind in a universal context?
Is this how we steward our world and each other?
Humanity is in the balance here. Will humanity be trusted by others we may encounter ‘out there’ on our way… or will we have skeletons in our closet that, when discovered, will show them we can never be trusted.
Look up!
(click picture to show the video)
A Perspective Everyone Should Ponder
Look up now… what you miss…
Earth Day – Causes In Question
Religion has its grievous deficits, but this damage to our earth has different causes.
We are being sold that we are like a virus, but we are not!
Most of humanity just wants to get by and be happy. It’s the corporations and the bankers behind them that are responsible, because they are who leads these kinds of efforts.
I’m aware that humans form corporations and bankers are human, but I see this more as an illness or a blight on humanity that goes even deeper.
Even cells get this kind of illness (cancer). Natural means hasn’t yet managed to intervene quick enough to prevent such devastation being worked upon itself.
For me, it is more about the hegemonic properties of any distribution in nature containing members who can choose and how the remainder of same cannot or will not do something about those choices when they lead to these kinds of consequences.
So you see, even ‘viruses’ have rules to obey. Especially those who can choose!
Intro to Common Law
(click picture to show the video)
1) Slang (learned before school)
2) Formal English (learned in school… hopefully)
3) Legal English (not learned in school and with varying proficiencies in law itself!)
Did you know that Civics was transitioned out of the curriculum of the school system during the years 1850 to 1950? It was replaced by ‘American Government’ (or something similar). Why is that important for philosophers, legal professionals and linguists?
That is what this thread is about. I will be adding to this thread over time as my understanding of this language grows.
Benefits of Meditation
It is vital to be able to slip into a state of calm on a moments notice.
I’ve been practicing this since 2007 so it’s pretty well a ‘part of me’ (internalized).
Please comment, if you have stories to tell or insights to share on this topic. (Example insight: breathing in through the nose and out through the mouth can enhance…)
“Freedom of Speech is a Privilege Intended for Educated Professionals”
“Freedom of Speech is a Privilege Intended for Educated Professionals”
“It should be illegal… if he cannot verify his statements…”
This is what happens when ‘Authority’ has been perverted to cancel an inherent right of humanity!
Are these ramifications being considered in Google Search?
Google is making what I feel are really big mistakes right now basing its technology upon the work of people who promulgate fear-control based paradigms and archetypes. Google is creating a beast that will devour even itself! See this, for an example: https://plus.google.com/104704674433954659866/posts/Mw9BR6WZNSQ
Behind the desire to stop gaming of Search from the outside, they do not provide us with a guarantee that Search will not be gamed from the inside!
What if you are deemed unpopular or dangerous to the ruling power monopoly?
Will they still let you have a voice or will they call you ‘non-authoritive’ or claim you’re not part of the search results because of a programming error!
It’s also about trust:
I’ve programmed SaaS applications (basically, cloud applications) and learned the basics of that technology from a well-known university which I won’t name here.
I was often in dispute with the professor and his proverbial ‘disciples’ (until they began to ignore me 😉 ) about the failing code of ethics and guarantee of privacy in the SaaS paradigm. Now, more than a year later, they ‘magically’ have made small progress in that vein.
I still wouldn’t trust them with my data and you shouldn’t either!
The terms and framing they have chosen will not save them from the coming ‘disruptive’ (using their term – I would use the term ‘reharmonizing’ instead) technologies that are coming down the pike which are going to change things drastically for everyone in a constructive(!) way! Google’s framing now, in comparison with these technologies as they arrive, will become a ‘straightjacket’ for itself.
There are those who are aware of this coming time (it’s all approaching a critical threshold very soon) and are preparing for it now, by creating free and open source technology with regard to Search and based upon a completely different paradigm of trust, openness and distributed control by putting that control in the hands of the user themselves.
http://mathesis-universalis.com
http://yacy.net/en/
(for just two of them)
This technology will be coming of age in the next 2 years – provided our controllers don’t take what’s left of the playing field away – which they have done before.
“Everything Is Miscellaneous” – David Weinberger
(click picture to show the Video)
Is that statement true? How does it sound to you?
Below is about how it sounds to me.
I can’t help but notice how most of the terminology (authority, sematic web, …) and thinking (ontologically based) seems to have been incorporated into Google Search!
I wrote this review 8 months ago as of this date.
I’m including it here again so that it appears on my time line correctly.
For those who have read my review before, please scan this one for possible changes or enhancements, because I will also be writing a review of David’s book in the near future.
This video confuses knowledge with information (among many other problems). I was as brief as I could be. Congrats to those who take the time to read this.
@04:10– We can have more than one field in one spot at the same time. We can also superimpose objects, ideas and knowledge…
@04:35– Some things must NOT go someplace physically although they are physical: hunger, thirst, …
@13:39-“Every attribute is a joint…”: only if you cannot associate these attributes with a surrounding context to place them in. Otherwise we have only data… miscellany.
@25:39-“There is no single way of organizing the world”: yet the ‘world’ does it quite nicely. We only run into trouble when we cannot or will not see the underlying structure in the organization. This structure cannot be separated from its form and function and still make sense.
@44:13-“through the public negotiation of conversation… That’s where knowledge is.” Knowledge however does not confine itself to being negotiated or even being correct and/or useful! Knowledge also encompasses much more than validity claims can confine. It is necessary to remember that knowledge and meaning are partners in the relationship they have with each other which may or may not involve truth value.
@44:23– A mailing list is used as a form of knowledge
@44:31-“I find out what the news is…” (information)
@44:33-“I see people who know way more than I do…” (authority)
@44:37-“…arguing amongst themselves…” (negotiation)(?)
@44:39-“…These are experts in conversation…” (authority)
@44:45-“…and this is a really, really good thing…” (judgment)
@44:47-“…really good thing – this public negotiation of knowledge through conversation…” (judgment)
The idea that knowledge is negotiable disturbs me. Do you not mean that the meaning of knowledge is negotiable? Your talk seems more to be describing information than it describes knowledge.
@44:33-“We know that Wikipedia is on our side.” Informed researchers are aware that Wikipedia contains, among its many strengths, many deficits. Not the least of those deficits is the bias found in much of its biographical information.
@49:47-“Oh God! I hate myself.” That utterance, while most certainly meant as humor on your part, is inappropriate for anyone to say – even in jest. I thought you should know.
Does a Nobel Prize Automatically Make You Correct?
My attention has been recently brought again to the book: Thinking, Fast and Slow.
There is so much ‘work’ out there to comment on that it would take many lifetimes to cover it all, but this one hits me right in the gut: it’s about heuristics.
Of course there are many insightful aspects to the book and I hope this post induces people to buy and read the book! It is definitely worth that effort!
There is much truth in the book and useful considerations regarding the psychology of thought (at least for me).
There is a universal constant in our universe that I call the ‘Near and Far Contraposition’. This constant is responsible for the effect we experience when we look at things close up verses far away.
It ‘makes it’s appearance’ when we say things like; “He can’t see the forest for the trees.”
I will describe this constant more below as time permits me to do so.
This post will delve into the misconceptions in the book regarding a heuristic and heuristics in general with respect to mind, thought and, most importantly, knowledge and its representation.
Your thoughts are welcome too, but allow me to do this piecemeal. We all are impacted by this artificial environment created for us that causes stress and economy in our lives. It is possible to an extent to ‘divorce’ ourselves from these frenetic states, but when our customers do not ‘cooperate’ (due to different priorities, perspectives and needs) with our efforts, then it does present challenges for us.
When Does The ‘Coming Out’ Of Destruction Want To Seem To Be Normal?
The source article is a deception (Source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists)
The globalist parasites that feed on us and have built this culture/environment we are ‘living’ in want us to believe the destruction they are bringing down upon humanity is a normal cycle.
If we believe them, then we deserve our fate!
Yet a natural process is taking place!
Outliers who occupy an upper ‘elite’ section of a distribution have always led the rest of the population it belongs to. What is decisively important is what attributes that small group shares and projects onto the rest.
This natural process can act as a sort of illness/enslavement or a healing/empowerment upon the rest of the population. This ‘constant form’ finds expression in practically every living system and upon multiple levels.
The need for illness and enslavement of the remaining population is a sign where this ‘elite class’ is based upon fear and control which is malevolent in nature. This leads to a severance of membership to the rest of the population and its own destruction and, quite possibly, the remaining population.
The need for healing and empowerment of the remaining population is a sign where this ‘elite class’ is based upon love and trust which is benevolent in nature. This leads to a binding of membership to the rest of the population and its own survival and, quite possibly, the remaining population.
We are being ruled by a malevolent elite class which has gone rogue and, like a cancer, wrapped its metastases in, through and around the rest of us. They do this by eliciting the aid of those who are asleep or unaware among us or by those who are awake/aware, but are unwilling or unable to resist them.
The ‘natural’ cycles mentioned in the article need not be! It is up to us to decide here and now what side of history we want to be on.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is quoted to have said: “We are not human beings having a spiritual experience, we are spiritual beings having a human experience.”
If that statement is true, then we are here for many reasons:
To discover who we are.
To create who we are.
To decide who we are.
To witness others.
…
To be of aid or be of service to others.
Who will you be, witness,… serve?
“In every revolution, there’s one man (or woman) with a vision…”
(click picture to show the video)
“If change is inevitable, predictable, beneficial…doesn’t logic demand that you be a part of it?”
“In every revolution, there’s one man (or woman) with a vision…”
Original Airdate: Oct 6, 1967
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708438/
Putting Knowledge Back Into the Hands of the People
(click picture to show the website)
Currently 1.68 TB (as of this date) of research data available!
The free exchange of ideas… again!
Heurist.me (Carey G. Butler) 