What do all things have in common?

Mathesis Universalis

Obfuscation In A ‘Nut’ Shell

Obfuscation In A ‘Nut’ Shell
Distinctions that are no differences, are incomplete, or are in discord.

In knowledge representation these ‘impurities’ (artificiality) and their influence are made easy to see.

 

In groks you will see them as obfuscation fields. That means darkening and/or inversion dynamics. The term refers to the visual representation of an obfuscated field, and can also be represented as dark and/or inverted movements of a field or group. I concentrate more on the dark versions here and will consider the inversions (examples of lying) in a future post.

They bring dynamics that are manipulative, artificial, or non-relevant into the knowledge representation. Their dynamic signatures make them stand out out like a sore thumb.

Cymatic images reveal these dynamics too. There are multiple vortexes, each with their own semantic contribution to the overall meaning to a knowledge molecule or group.

Here is an example of a snow flake (seen below) https://www.flickr.com/photos/13084997@N03/12642300973/in/album-72157625678493236/
From Linden Gledhill.

Note that not all vortexes are continuous through the ‘bodies’ of the molecules they participate in. Also, in order to correctly visualize what I’m saying, one must realize that the cymatic images are split expressions. That means to see the relationship, you must add the missing elements which are hinted at by the image.

Every cymatic image is a cut through the dynamics it represents.
We are in effect seeing portions of something whole. Whole parts are dissected necessarily, because the surface of expression is limited to a ‘slice’ through the complete molecule.

(Only the two images marked ‘heurist.com’ are my own! The other images are only meant as approximations to aid in the understanding of my work.)


The Creation Of ‘Care’

The Seven Hermetic Principles

The Creation of ‘Care’
The 8th Principle of Natural Law: Care
The ‘container’ in which all of the principles of natural law exist.
What we care about on a daily basis acts as the driving force of our thoughts and actions.

Care+Knowledge+Action (Feeling, Mind, Being)

This is the reason my mother named me ‘Care-y’. She told me as a child when I asked her why she named me Carey that I would be the one who cares.

Note how this is the opposite of what our parasitic slave owners want. They even celebrate the opposite. They call it the ‘Cremation of Care’. Here a description on WikiLies): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation_of_Care

Actual footage of the ceremony here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5dHhvpHIjM

The parasites sucking us dry for centuries now have the religion to make us want to not care any more. “Stand down and accept your chains… that’s what their religion is there for.” – Mark Passio

Mark Passio’s brief introduction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Bs6sWFvJbU
Go to @42:43 in the video for ‘Care’.

Full Version of his Natural Law seminar is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIEemKcy-4E

 


Artificial Liberty – Your freedom is an illusion and the Liberty Bell has a crack in it.

Artificial Liberty

Your freedom is an illusion and the Liberty Bell has a crack in it.

Toto! Please pull back the curtain!

Note when the bell was cracked: http://www.history.com/news/ask-history/why-is-the-liberty-bell-cracked

192 years ago you didn’t have to ask permission from the government to:

  • Go fishing, collect rain water, use a transportation vehicle, build a home or renovate it.
  • You didn’t have to pay tax upon tax with already taxed money.
  • You didn’t have to ask permission and pay to be married, obtain licenses, certifications or permits to hunt, own a weapon, become a carpenter or any other trade or profession.
  • You didn’t have to ask permission to protest or redress Government, or sell a product or have your income illegally taxed by the 16th Amendment, which was never ratified!

You can virtually do “NOTHING” without being extorted by government and obtaining their permission first.

If you still think you’re FREE you’re deluding yourself. You live in an ‘open air prison’ as ‘free range humans’ thoroughly manipulated and controlled by the illusion of a free society.

The banksters and the ‘diplomats’ THEY choose are all exempt. They form the neo-royalty of ‘Too Big To Fail’ sitting off-shore and ‘safe’ from their own edicts.

They just love Socialism and Communism, because they can exempt themselves from the political structure and _suck the life out of it like vampires, as in TPP , TPIP , central banks (making money out of ‘thin air’), and all their taxing systems.

They are now in ‘panic mode’, because WE are waking up to them.
http://wutsayyou.com/elite-hold-secret-meeting-extremely-nervous/


Beware The Serpent And His Oil

invasionLink to video (or click picture)

Donald Trump tells the story of mass invasion.
A short and succinct video.

I say make the banksters take them in! It is THEY who displaced them with their funding both sides of almost every war since Rome and every war since Napoleon!


Communism – Snake Oil Manufactured and Sold to Enslave You

Communism

Communism is the ‘snake oil’ sold by Satanists, created by fraud, and propagated by a ‘wrecking crew’ to make the tyranny of a few popular to the masses.


Maritime Admiralty Law in 10 Minutes

The Real Laws Of The Land

The Real Laws Of The Land

Maritime Admiralty Law in 10 Minutes
You are ‘owned’ just by acquiescing to that ‘ownership’.

 


Men And Their Semantics – Turning Meaning into Legos

language

Semantically speaking: Does meaning structure unite languages?

This work is a dead end waiting to happen. Of course it will attract much interest, money, and perhaps even yield new insights into the commonality of language, but there’s better ways to get there.

What’s even more sad is that they, who should know better, will see my intentions in making this clear as destructive criticism instead of a siren warning regarding research governed/originating through a false paradigm. These people cannot see or overlook the costs humanity pays for the misunderstandings research like this causes and is based upon.

It’s even worse in the field of genetic engineering with their chimera research. The people wasting public money funding this research need to be gotten under control again.

I don’t want to criticize the researcher’s intentions. It’s their framing and methodology that I see as primitive, naive, and incomplete.

I’m not judging who they are nor their ends; rather, their means of getting there.

“Quantification” is exactly the wrong way to ‘measure/compare semantics; not to mention “partitioning” them!

1) The value in this investigation that they propose is to extrapolate and interpolate ontology. Semantics are more than ontology. They possess a complete metaphysics which includes their epistemology.

2) You cannot quantify qualities, because you reduce the investigation to measurement; which itself imposes meaning upon the meaning you wish to measure. Semantics, in their true form, are relations and are non-physical and non-reducible.

3) Notice also, partitioning is imposed upon the semantics (to make them ‘measurable/comparable’). If you compare semantics in such a way then you only get answers in terms of your investigation/ontology.

4) The better way is to leave the semantics as they are! Don’t classify them! Learn how they are related. Then you will know how they are compared.

There’s more to say, but I think you get the idea… ask me if you want clarification…


Organic VS. Artificial and Weaponized Culture

Tradition vs Cultural MarxismVideo on YouTube

Organic VS. Artificial and Weaponized Culture
The parasitic banksters need to force an artificial and pre-mature form of globalism upon us instead of allowing a natural and organic evolution.

Everywhere nationalism tries to take hold, it is attacked and marginalized. We MUST be allowed to maintain our individual and collective identities when we evolve. If we don’t, we move too fast and without wisdom.


Nobel Prize For Stating The Obvious

Nobel Prize for the Obvious

Nobel Prize For Stating The Obvious
You can get a Nobel for anything these days: Obama for peace(!) and Merkel soon for treason, for example.

You need only be ‘connected’ or have something to say or do that our controllers value.

In this one we have 3 points:
1) ‘Huh’ and its variants appear in 31 languages
2) People stop for clarification in conversation once every 90 seconds
3) People share the burden of fixing misunderstanding in conversation.

Now if you didn’t know this already, then celebrate!


‘Trust’ For Sale

Tribe of Trust 2

‘Trust’ For Sale
More of Google’s attempt to become the ‘clearing house’ of truthful, ‘trustful’, and important facts and therewith create a ‘truthful tribe’. I thought we wanted to rid ourselves of tribalism?

So many talented people will never be known, because they work ‘under the radar’ or for being ignored (exiled) as ‘heretics’.

Here is a question: how can even truth, not to mention trust, be systematized when we cannot know all of it as well as its many sources of origination?

Google is creating its own demise with this. It will go down or cause a vast migration of awakened (and non-evangelists) to move to, create, or participate in other search engines.

True research must make it’s own decisions upon what is truthful, trustworthy, and valuable. If we allow a corporation to manage these values, we will enter an age of ‘privatized credibility’.

They will be able to keep people out of the debate (social discourse) by making them non-authoritative. If they can establish metrics then everyone must conform to them.

It’s like believing Marx, Engels, and Lenin were philosophers when they were really children playing with snake-oil in order to sell the idea that a tyranny of Communism was the solution to humanity’s problems.


Typical Knowledge Acquisitions Node

Knowledge Representation

A typical knowledge acquisition node showing two layers of abstraction. Note how some of the acquisition field detection moves with the observer’s perspective. You can tell, due to the varying visual aspects of the fields and their conjunctions that it has already been primed and in use.

This node may be one of thousands/millions/billions which form when acquiring the semantics of any particular signal set.

Their purpose is to encode a waveform of meaning.

Basically it is these ‘guys’ which do the work of ‘digesting’ the knowledge contained within any given signal; sort of like what enzymes do in our cells.

The size, colour (although not here represented), orientation, quantity, sequence, and other attributes of the constituent field representations all contribute to a unique representation of those semantics the given node has encountered along its travel through any particular set of signal. The knowledge representation (not seen here) is comprised of the results of what these nodes do.

This node represents a unique cumulative ‘imprint’ or signature derived from the group of knowledge molecules it has processed during its life time in the collation similar to what a checksum does in a more or less primitive fashion for numerical values in IT applications.

I have randomized/obfuscated a bit here (in a few different ways), as usual, so that I can protect my work and release it in a prescribed and measured way over time.

In April I will be entering the 7th year of working on this phase of my work. I didn’t intentionally plan it this way, but the number 7 does seem to be a ‘number of completion’ for me as well.

The shape of the model was not intended in itself. It ‘acquired’ this shape during the course of its work. It could have just as well been of a different type (which I’m going to show here soon).

Important is the ‘complementarity’ of the two shapes as they are capable of encoding differing levels of abstraction. The inner model is more influenced by the observer than the outer one, for example. The outer shape contains a sort of ‘summary’ of what the inner shape has processed.


Race Baiting Is Trendy – Political Correctness Until ALL Are Silent

Melissa Harris-Perry - Be super careful

Link to video.

It’s as if history started and stopped in the American Civil War. Yet all through history including Greeks, Persians, Egyptians, Romans,… all had slaves of ALL races. This was always a HUMAN problem, not a BLACK one!

We are encountering a new kind of racism now: Reverse racism.

The new racism is being fed by social engineers like Melissa Harris-Perry. I’ve posted on this woman before and many times on this subject.
Melissa Harris-Perry also thinks your children are property of the State:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29FhZ5Dseec

They are being funded by the likes of George Soros and their goal is to sow enmity between the races.

http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/billionaire-george-soros-funded-ferguson-riots-34230/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/20/soros-backed-group-launches-bid-to-keep-syrian-refugees-flowing/

Many poor and unfortunate people OF ALL RACES (as you know) are buying into the scam. If the social engineers are successful, they will have us all going at each other in the streets so that the real people causing the fighting (the #banksters ) can come in and play referee.

They then will roll out new laws and a police state more than already has been seen. There’s history of the torture and maiming of humanity all throughout even the dark ages, yet we are so connected to this race baiting that we see nothing else.

The banksters want us to dwell on the cruel treatment of slaves, but the real issues go much deeper. It’s about being manipulated by people who PROFIT from slavery AND racism that is our main concern. We must examine causes and not just symptoms.

Cruelty has been worked upon ALL people of the world. Slavery as well. Look at the CAUSES of it, instead of what cruelty was done. These are the REAL issues that humanity must deal with: why it happened and why racism is being baited now?

What do I have to do with people who were here BEFORE I was born?!?

We all have families that were slaves!

There is never a mention of black slave traders:
http://www.amren.com/news/2013/03/did-black-people-own-slaves/

No mention of black slave owners:

http://www.teachingushistory.org/lessons/BlackSlaveOwnersinCharleston.html

Nor the existence of white slaves is mentioned; some of which were owned by blacks!

http://www.ironbarkresources.com/slaves/whiteslaves09.htmSlavery is a human problem not a racial one.

The Irish were bought sold by all races: https://peoplestrusttoronto.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/irish-the-forgotten-white-slaves/Here Mulatto Slave traders:

http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/10/mulatto_slave_traders_who_were_they.htmlThe Africans even fought among each other in the traffic of their own peoples:
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/41431#sthash.nzakX2KK.dpuf

and

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Perspectives_1/article_8941.shtmlEven Jews were involved (and quite prominently, I might add:

http://rense.com/general69/invo.htm

It’s so sad how young and fertile minds are so easy to turn towards destruction. I won’t play the chump. I SEE how we are being manipulated.

I personally have Irish, Scottish, American Indian, Black, and Mexican people in my family. What are we now to do – ‘disown’ and hate each other just because the ‘Collective’s’ social engineers want us to go at each other?

I decided I will not be played for a chump. Notice also here the term for people as ‘folks’ (a radical’s term for people being chumped).

See Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals:
http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals


Our ‘Owners’ Will Still Eat Meat – The Weaponization Of Our Emotions

why+should+i+go+veganOur ‘Owners’ Will Still Eat Meat – The Weaponization Of Our Emotions
The best of our intentions are being used against us.

The parasitic class is active on many levels right now, just like with mandatory vaccinations, by pushing those of us who cannot or will not differentiate the truth (see beyond their own bias), towards stigmatizing the consumption of meat and meat products; be it through animal rights groups, GAIA movements, Vegetarians, or Vegans.

These well-intentioned people think, each for their own personal reasons, that everyone should go without any meat and/or dairy products. It’s not enough to make it a choice for everyone, it must be forced and coerced upon those who they think don’t care about animals.

The conditions that animals must endure in the meat industry is not the fault of people who eat meat, nor is it because meat is eaten; rather, because of the corporations and the governments / bureaucracies they now control who have injected themselves into the farming of animals! It is they who are dictating to farmers how to raise and care for the animals in their charge.
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/agriculture/problem/Corporations-Control-Our-Food/

It’s not about being safe either; it’s about control… control of the ‘slaves’ (us). Don’t think for one moment that they who control our governments are going to regulate themselves! No, the many regulations are only meant for us ‘serfs’ in their neo-Feudalism.
http://www.thegoodmanchronicle.com/2012/11/while-you-eat-poison-elite-eat-organic.html

It’s also about dividing us against each other. It’s about using our own empathy towards animals and turning it into a weapon against humanity itself.  It is the weoponization of our emotions.

The truth is many indigenous peoples have been eating meat for many thousands of years and have done so in ways that are not violent.

I will continue posts on this subject as time permits. One of my next posts will be to debunk people like this Dr. Gregor here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0IhZ-R1O8g

Nothing is as it seems… even the best among us have been ‘weaponized’ and don’t have any desire for you to wake them up from their trance. In fact; they see you as standing in their way!


Really! Nothing Is ‘Real’

Is anything RealAnother example of the ‘neo-snake-oil salesmen’ peddling you trendy pabulum and neo-Babylon confusion. My current project Mathesis Universalis http://mathesis-universalis.com will bring an end to this menagerie of nonsense and subtle programming.

I could write a book on this.
Don’t believe everything put forward in this… set of perspectives. This is a work in process so stay tuned… updates are coming very shortly.

I’m happy that he allows for more than 5 senses as this is a common error made by science and philosophy up to this time. I’ve taken issue with it elsewhere numerous times. Also I’m pleased that he is allowing for Neuroplasticity (Dr. Jeffrey M. Schwartz http://www.jeffreymschwartz.com/ has been leading this new model for over 10 years.)

Up to @04:27 I take issue with two important assumptions he makes:
1) That sensory information is the only way we ‘register’ reality.
2) He is a physicalist pure through. If he can’t measure and quantify it, then it doesn’t exist for him… This leads to what is known as causal ambiguity (among other things).
http://psychologydictionary.org/causal-ambiguity/

@04:57– He says that memory is stored all over the brain. This is incorrect. The effects of the phenomena of memory are manifested in various areas of the brain. There is no sufficient and necessary proof that memory is stored there! They PRESUME it to be stored there, because they can not allow or imagine anything non-physical being able to store any kind of knowledge.

@05:09“How many memories can you fit inside your head? What is the storage capacity of the human brain?” he asks.

In addition to the presumption that memories are stored there, he then ignores the capacity of other areas of the body to imprint the effects of memory: the digestive tract, the endocrine and immune ‘systems’,… even to cell membranes (in cases of addiction, for example)!!!

@05:23“But given the amount of neurons in the human brain involved with memory…” (the first presumption that memories are stored there) “and the number of connections a single neuron can make…” (he’s turning this whole perspective on memory into a numerical problem!) which is reductionism.

@05:27– He then refers to the work of Paul Reber, professor of psychology at Northwestern University who explained his ‘research’ into answering that question. here’s the link. I will break that further stream of presumptions down next.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-memory-capacity/
(the question is asked about middle of the 1st page of the article which contains 2 pages)

Paul Reber makes a joke and then says:
“The human brain consists of about one billion neurons. Each neuron forms about 1,000 connections to other neurons, amounting to more than a trillion connections. If each neuron could only help store a single memory, running out of space would be a problem. You might have only a few gigabytes of storage space, similar to the space in an iPod or a USB flash drive.”

“Yet neurons combine so that each one helps with many memories at a time, exponentially increasing the brain’s memory storage capacity to something closer to around 2.5 petabytes (or a million gigabytes). For comparison, if your brain worked like a digital video recorder in a television, 2.5 petabytes would be enough to hold three million hours of TV shows. You would have to leave the TV running continuously for more than 300 years to use up all that storage.”

These presumptions and observations are full of ambiguity and guesswork. Given that we are not reading a thesis on the subject, we can allow him a little slack, but even the conclusions he has arrived at are nothing substantial. More below as he reveals his lack of knowledge next.

“The brain’s exact storage capacity for memories is difficult to calculate. First, we do not know how to measure the size of a memory. Second, certain memories involve more details and thus take up more space; other memories are forgotten and thus free up space. Additionally, some information is just not worth remembering in the first place.

He not only doesn’t know to measure memories (which he admits), he cannot even tell you what they are precisely! He offers here also no reason for us to believe that memory is reducible to information!

@05:50“The world is real… right?” (I almost don’t want to know what’s coming next!)

And then it really gets wild…

@05:59– With his: “How do you know?” question he begins to question the existence of rocket scientists. He moves to Sun centric ideas (we’ve heard this one before) to show how wrong humanity has been in the past.

He seems to ignore or not be aware of the fact that that many pre-science explorers as far back as ancient Alexandria knew better and had documented this idea as being false. This ‘error’ of humanity reveals more about dogma of a church/religion/tradition than of humanity/reality as it truly is.

@06:29“Do we… or will we ever know true reality?” is for him the next question to ask and then offers us to accept the possibility that we may only know what is approximately true.

@06:37 “Discovering more and more useful theories every day,  but never actually reaching true objective actual reality.”

This question is based upon so much imprecision, ignorance, and arrogance that it isn’t even useful!

First of all: we cannot know “true objective actual reality” in all of its ‘essence’, because we must form a perspective around that which we observe in order to ‘see’ anything meaningful. As soon as a perspective comes into ‘being’, we lose objectivity. (ignorance, assumption)

He doesn’t define what ‘reality’ for him is. (imprecision)

He doesn’t explain what the difference between ‘true’ and ‘actual’ might be. (imprecision, assumption)

Theories are NOT discovered, rather created (implicit arrogance). They can only be discovered if they were already known/formulated at some time.

Also; theories do not stand on their own; rather, they depend upon continued affirmation by being questioned for as long as they exist. We DO NOT store knowledge in our answers; rather, in our questions.

[continued…]


The Google ‘Oracle’ – An Upside-Down Paradigm

How To Keep Google Happy

The Google ‘Oracle’ – An Upside-Down Paradigm
I think the ‘philosophy’ is backwards.
Why isn’t Google keeping US ‘happy’?

In a free market it is NOT a corporation which decides which product to use; rather, the consumers who buy their products.
Google has the paradigm backwards, don’t you think?

There are four major issues:
1) They are positioning themselves as ‘knowledge brokers’ and are trying to insert the ideas of ownership and privatization into the Noosphere. No one person (even artificial ‘humans’ which corporations are) or group has the right to lay claim on knowledge. It must remain free to everyone.

2) Their manipulation of search results. I now have to use several different search engines to get my work done since they’ve moved to Search. It’s not the job of a search engine to decide for me what’s important! Not even to ‘protect’ me.

3) Their efforts to insert themselves into the noosphere as arbiters of the conceptual landscape. This is known as #KBT Knowledge Based Trust.

4) The upper leadership belongs to what I call the ‘wrecking crew’. Google is actively participating in the premature globalization, social engineering, and weaponized technologization we see all around us.

Link to website:
http://www.businessbrokendown.com/business-tips/how-to-keep-google-happy-with-your-website/


You Had Your Say? – Not At YouTube

YouTube Censorship 001 YouTube Censorship 002 YouTube Censorship 003 YouTube Censorship 004 YouTube Censorship 005 YouTube Censorship 006 YouTube Censorship 007 YouTube Censorship 008

You Had Your Say? – Not At YouTube
This is a photo documentation of the comment section of a TED video I criticized yesterday. Notice that the time of the comparison was over 24 hours after the post… you’d think that would be enough time to synchronize all the servers, but it wasn’t!

It was enough for other’s comment, but not for mine.

Even though many people posted AFTER me, my sort order was ‘Newest First’, the two comparisons are from the same area with one being anonymous, they show no signs of my comment!

If you thought your free speech is allowed a place at YouTube, think again.

Here’s a link to the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzN4WGPC4kc
See for yourself.


A Holon’s Topology, Morphology, and Dynamics (2a)

A Holon’s Topology, Morphology, and Dynamics (2a)
IntroVideo2a -3131
This is the second video of a large series and the very first video in a mini-series about holons. In this series I will be building the vocabulary of holons which in turn will be used in my knowledge representations.
The video following this one will go into greater detail describing what you see here and will be adding more to the vocabulary.

This is the second video of a large series and the very first video in a mini-series about holons. In this series I will be building the vocabulary of holons which in turn will be used in my knowledge representations.


Precursors Of Knowledge

Precursors of KnowledgePrecursors Of Knowledge
Fractal fields provide a nice framework in which to think about knowledge. They are not all we need for precision, but they are helpful in a generic way. I’ll be posting more on them as the knowledge representations are published, because there are many ‘gaps to fill’ to show how these relate to knowledge.

More sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nTLI89vdzg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZVNIZGw4X0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp4ogF2w13M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UPD2_gEjvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArZLXHVVV5I


Information Visualization Is Not Knowledge Representation

Information visualization is not Knowledge Representation

(Lynda.com – Overview of Data Visualization)

Information Visualization Is Not Knowledge Representation
This great video from Lynda.com shows how the processing language/interpreter is great for modeling information.

With such a multitude of interesting ways to model data, we find it hard to resist the temptation to call this knowledge, but it’s not!

All of the wonderful representations here still require us to interpret their meaning!

What if there were a way to present knowledge in which our own understanding is not required to interpret them? What if our understanding of what we have presented to us becomes part of the presentation itself, and in fact, influences what we take from that representation?

We obviously need knowledge representation that can provide their meaning on their own for only they can provide a true understanding of their inherent structure and dynamics.

You see real understanding is the personalization of knowledge into your own mind. If your mind cannot dialog with that knowledge, it’s not really yours and if your mind does all the work, it’s only information.


The Parasites ‘Need’ a Pow Wow

The richest want a PowWowThe Parasites ‘Need’ a Pow Wow The ‘need’ (control/fear fetish) for full-spectrum dominance. We must live out their nightmare so that they can save us. Will they be proud of their ‘work’ in a galactic context when our neighbors see what we’re up to?

We suffer from an awful shortage of humans in the universe, but they tell us there’s too many of us! It’s all an expression of their fear and need to control others. Even where there are no problems, they will create them so that they may mark them, touch them and make them ‘safe’.

Our problem isn’t a lack of resources, it’s the hoarding of them!


Rationally Bayesian Doesn’t Help You See The Elephant!

Julia Galef - Think Rationally via Bayes' RuleHere a proven social engineering device ‘conspiracy theory’ is being used to contrast Bayesian logic and fails miserably in discovering truth by doing so.

The example used for ‘conspiracy thinking’ was the ignorance of an elected official during WW2, California Governor Earl Warren https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Warren
Who interestingly enough, got placed on the Supreme Court by the parasitic class later in his career!

We literally swim in a world of conspiracies (look up LIBOR scandal, for just one example: http://www.liborscandal.org/index.html), yet we are supposed to marginalize each other with ridicule like ‘nut job’ and ‘conspiracy theorist’ to keep us in the ‘safe’ and ‘permissible’ trendy mainstream dominant social memes.

The criminal banksters and their corporations get to hide in plain sight and we police each other for crossing boundaries they have set for us! They can wreak havoc on our planet and blame humanity for their deeds. Note however, that Bayesian Logic can’t even grasp this structure and dynamics.

This shows how a statistical and frequency-oriented approach to looking at our world is no guarantee of even seeing the proverbial ‘elephant in the room’!


Hoarding Can Be Cancer Too

What is Wrong with the World

Hoarding Can Be Cancer Too
This short video’s symbolism and message is paradigm changing. The video stems from a religious message and also contains a bit of idealism, but has meaning even to agnostics and atheists alike.

The Universe is suffering from a shortage of humans right now. Please do your share to rectify this situation by having many children who do not need to hoard.

The true measure of the value of a society finds expression in how it treats its weakest members: the old, infirm, and children.

 


Universal Constants, Variations and Identities – #14 (Singular/Plural)

Constants and Variances 1 Constants and Variances 2

Universal Constants, Variations and Identities
#14 Singular and plural arise together. (Singular/Plural)

There is no singular without a plural representation except in the non-dual.

See http://mathesis-universalis.com for more information.

#Knowledge #Wisdom #Understanding #Learning #Insight #Constants #Variances #Philosophy #MathesisUniversalis #ScientiaUniversalis #PhilosophicaUniversalis #LogicaUniversalis #MetaMathematics #MetaLogic #MetaScience #MetaPhysics #MetaPhilosophy #Singular #Plural


Universal Constants, Variations and Identities #13 (Knowledge)

Knowlege Is What Awareness Does

Universal Constants, Variations and Identities
#13 Knowledge is what awareness does. (Knowledge)

I’ve published this before elsewhere, but it must be restated now for what is to follow (I’m starting a new octave).

#Knowledge #Wisdom #Understanding #Learning #Insight #Constants #Variances #Metaphysics #Philosophy #MathesisUniversalis #ScientiaUniversalis #PhilosophiaUniversalis #LogicaUniversalis #MetaMathematics #MetaLogic #MetaScience #MetaPhysics #MetaPhilosophy #Awareness